Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-88625

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a large scale multipronged diabetes awareness program provided through community involvement in Chennai. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mass awareness and free screening camps were conducted between 2004-2007 at various locations of Chennai as part of the Prevention, Awareness, Counselling and Evaluation [PACE] Diabetes Project. During a 3-year period, 774 diabetes awareness camps were conducted to reach the public directly. After the PACE project was completed, 3000 individuals, representative of Chennai, were surveyed in 2007 using a systematic stratified random sampling technique. The results were compared to a similar survey carried out, as part of the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study [CURES] in 2001-2002, which served as a measure of baseline diabetes awareness. RESULTS: Awareness of a condition called "diabetes" increased significantly from 75.5% in 2001-2002 (CURES) to 81% (p < 0.001) in 2007 (PACE). 74.1% of the citizens of Chennai are now aware that the prevalence of diabetes is increasing as compared to 60.2% earlier [p < 0.001]. Significantly more people felt that diabetes could be prevented (p < 0.001), and that a combination of diet and exercise were needed to do so (p < 0.001). Respondents reporting obesity, family history of diabetes, hypertension and mental stress as risk factors increased significantly after PACE (p < 0.001). More people were able to correctly identify the eyes (PACE 38.1% compared to CURES--16.1%, p < 0.001), kidney (PACE 42.3% compared to CURES 16.10%, p < 0.001), heart (PACE 4.6% compared to CURES 5.8%, p < 0.001) and feet (PACE 35.0% vs. CURES 21.9%, p < 0.001) as the main organs affected by diabetes. CONCLUSION: Through direct public education and mass media campaigns, awareness about diabetes and its complications can be improved even in a whole city. If similar efforts are implemented state-wise and nationally, prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, specifically diabetes and cardiovascular disease, is an achievable goal in India.


Subject(s)
Awareness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , India , Mass Screening , Patient Education as Topic , Program Evaluation , Risk Factors
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-87313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Prevention Awareness Counselling Evaluation (PACE) Diabetes Project is a large scale community based project carried out to increase awareness of diabetes and its complications in Chennai city (population: 4.7 million) through 1) public education 2) media campaigns 3) general practitioner training 4) blood sugar screening and 5) community based "real life" prevention program METHODS: Education took place in multiple forms and venues over the three-year period of the PACE project between 2004-2007. With the help of the community, awareness programs were conducted at residential sites, worksites, places of worship, public places and educational institutions through lectures, skits and street plays. Messages were also conveyed through popular local television and radio channels and print media. The General Practitioners (GPs) program included training in diabetes prevention, treatment and the advantages of early detection of complications. Free random capillary blood glucose testing was done for individuals who attended the awareness programs using glucose meter. RESULTS: Over a three-year period, we conducted 774 education sessions, 675 of which were coupled with opportunistic blood glucose screening. A total of 76,645 individuals underwent blood glucose screening. We also set up 176 "PACE Diabetes Education Counters" across Chennai, which were regularly replenished with educational materials. In addition, we trained 232 general practitioners in diabetology prevention, treatment and screening for complications. Multiple television and radio shows were given and messages about diabetes sent as Short Message Service (SMS) through mobile phones. Overall, we estimate that we reached diabetes prevention messages to nearly two million people in Chennai through the PACE Diabetes Project, making it one of the largest diabetes awareness and prevention programs ever conducted in India. CONCLUSION: Mass awareness and screening programs are feasible and, through community empowerment, can help in prevention and control of non-commuincable diseases such as diabetes and its complications on a large scale.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control , Health Education/methods , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , India , Mass Screening
3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-88089

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score for detecting undiagnosed diabetes in India. METHODS: The risk score was derived from the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES), an ongoing epidemiological study on a representative population of Chennai. Phase 1 of CURES recruited 26,001 individuals, of whom every tenth subject was requested to participate in Phase 3 for screening for diabetes using World Health Organization (WHO) 2 hour venous plasma glucose criteria [i.e. > or = 200 mg/dl]. The response rate was 90.4% (2350/2600). The Indian Diabetes Risk Score [IDRS] was developed based on results of multiple logistic regression analysis. Internal validation was performed on the same data. RESULTS: IDRS used four risk factors: age, abdominal obesity, family history of diabetes and physical activity. Beta co-efficients were derived based on a multiple logistic regression analysis using undiagnosed diabetes as the dependent variable. The beta co-efficients were modified so as to obtain a maximum possible score of 100. Receiver Operating Characteristic [ROC] curves were constructed to identify the optimum value of IDRS for detecting diabetes by WHO consulting group criteria. Area under the curve for ROC was 0.698 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.663-0.733). An IDRS value > or = 60 had the optimum sensitivity (72.5%) and specificity (60.1%) for determining undiagnosed diabetes with a positive predictive value of 17.0%, negative predictive value of 95.1%, and accuracy of 61.3%. CONCLUSION: This simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score is useful for identifying undiagnosed diabetic subjects in India and could make screening programmes more cost effective.


Subject(s)
Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL